When we think about sourcing in healthcare, our minds often go straight to the clinical side of things—medical devices, surgical supplies, and other critical patient care items. But what about non-clinical items? From office furniture to printers, these often-overlooked products play a crucial role in maintaining smooth operations within healthcare organizations, yet they rarely receive the same level of strategic focus. During a recent Power Supply Advisory Group meeting, the conversation dove into the complexities of setting standards for non-clinical sourcing, highlighting the importance of quality, service, and balancing local supplier engagement. This article explores these challenges, aiming to spark further discussion and innovation within the industry.
The Challenge of Standardization in a Crowded Market
Establishing standards for non-clinical items isn’t just about picking products off a list—it’s about defining what matters most to your organization. Patrick Broos opened the discussion with a challenge familiar to many: "It’s a struggle to develop standards in today’s environment with so many suppliers and manufacturers in the mix." The growing pool of options complicates decisions around quality, service, and user experience, pushing supply chain leaders to rethink their traditional approach.
The shift from product-focused to service-focused standards emerged as a key theme. For items like office chairs, wear and tear can vary drastically depending on usage, service, and support standards, which often outweigh initial product specifications. As Broos emphasized, "It's not just about the materials or the warranty; it's about whether a supplier can quickly respond when something goes wrong." This highlights the critical role of reliable service and support in non-clinical sourcing decisions.
Warranties and the Weight They Carry
When evaluating non-clinical products, warranties often play a decisive role. Matt Hoffmann highlighted his reliance on long-term warranties, stating, "The 12-year warranty is a game-changer—it covers free repairs and adds a layer of security in our decision-making." The ability to rely on robust service agreements reduces the overall burden on facilities teams and supports better long-term planning.
But warranties aren’t just about saving money—they're about ensuring consistent performance and minimizing disruptions. Hoffmann's experience underscores the importance of looking beyond the initial purchase price and considering the total cost of ownership, especially when establishing standards that impact daily operations.
Tracking Data: Building a Structure
One of the key issues raised during the discussion was the inconsistent approach to data collection for non-clinical items. Unlike clinical products, which often have detailed tracking systems in place, non-clinical items historically lack structured monitoring, making it challenging to evaluate their long-term quality and performance. Using the previous example of the office chair to illustrate his point, Justin Poulin questioned, "How do you really know the quality of a chair if you’re not tracking how often it breaks?" This gap in data management is a significant issue many supply chain professionals face.
Brian Bartel reinforced the need for a more structured approach, stating, "You need to have a tracking mechanism to verify the quantity or the quality. You’ll have that quality metric up front, but then tracking on the back-end.” Bartel emphasized that even seemingly simple processes can become complex without proper data collection, making a formalized tracking system essential for effective decision-making. His remarks underscore the broader sentiment that robust tracking systems are critical to optimizing sourcing strategies.
Balancing Act: Engaging Local Suppliers with Standards
Supporting local suppliers is a priority for many healthcare organizations, driven by the desire to support community businesses. However, engaging local suppliers often presents challenges, particularly when these vendors do not meet the broader contractual requirements of GPOs. Jody Eastland highlighted the delicate nature of this balance, stating, "We have a couple of companies that have been family-owned for a number of years, and if we went GPO, we’d be forced to shift to larger regional companies, putting these local businesses at risk." This sentiment underscores the pressure to support local suppliers while adhering to organizational standards and budget constraints.
The group’s discussion emphasized the need for careful vetting of local suppliers and a willingness to adjust processes as standards and expectations evolve. Balancing local engagement with compliance is not just about ticking boxes; it’s about finding the right fit for both the organization and the community it serves.
Beyond the Basics: The Emotional Side of Sourcing
Non-clinical sourcing isn’t just about numbers—it’s also about navigating personal preferences and emotional attachments. Brian Bartel touched on this when discussing the challenges of standardizing items like office chairs and printers, noting, “Most people, as long as they can print what they want, they don’t necessarily care. But when you start telling them what they have to sit in all day, that can be a bit more challenging.” This highlights how preferences around comfort, design, and brand loyalty can create resistance to change, making it crucial to engage end-users in decision-making processes.
This dynamic was evident in the group's broader conversation, where seemingly straightforward items like paper sizes or coffee brands sparked unexpected resistance, proving that the emotional side of sourcing often complicates standardization efforts.
Looking Ahead: A Call for Collaboration and Consistency
The discussion highlighted the multifaceted challenges of non-clinical sourcing and underscored the need for structured, data-driven approaches. By aligning quality metrics, service standards, and performance tracking, organizations can better navigate the crowded landscape of non-clinical products. But more than anything, the conversation served as a reminder that standardization in healthcare supply chains is as much about people as it is about products.
As supply chain leaders continue to refine their strategies, fostering an environment of collaboration and open dialogue will be crucial. By sharing experiences and insights, we can collectively push toward more consistent, reliable, and cost-effective sourcing practices that benefit the entire healthcare ecosystem. These efforts not only improve operational efficiency but also help build a stronger, more resilient supply chain that supports healthcare organizations in delivering high-quality care.
If you're interested in joining our Power Supply Advisory Group and contributing to these vital discussions shaping the future of healthcare supply chain management, we'd love to hear from you! Please send your inquiries and a copy of your resume to Justin Poulin at justin@powersupplymedia.com.
Comments